Knowledge Base/Announcements /What's Happening Now

December 6: Updated Privacy page, support for date ranges

Amanda
posted this on December 06, 2012 10:52 AM

Enhancements:

  • Updated the Privacy Policy page. All living profiles (those that are unclaimed and not Master Profiles) are now private and will not be searchable on Google.
  • Added support for date ranges. You may now specify date ranges using Before, After and Between.
  • Limited GEDCOM exports to 10x the number of profiles you've added 
  • You can now export a GEDCOM on any profile you've added for free

Fixes

  • Fixed display of check marks in search results
 

Comments latest first

User photo
Rosalie Lazar

I agree with this comment

"Personally, I will be horrified if I can no longer make my deceased relatives private back to 3rd great-grandparent and out to 4th cousin ....  Also because in some cases there is definitely info there that was entered in the understanding that these profiles could be kept private so only Family could see them  This would definitely be a violation of what they promised us.  

Yes I agree !

April 03, 2013 08:42 PM
User photo
William Harry Chapman, Jr
Pro

So much negativity about an exciting development.

We are all part of the complex process of merging two huge genealogical resources; anyone with any knowledge of software development and/or company merges will know that some changes are going to take place. Some of those changes will please us, others will be less satisfying but let us at least give the benefit of the doubt to the new, combined. management and technical teams to turn the finished product into a better genealogical resource. No commercial company in its right mind would knowingly make the product less useful for its users; we would simply give our custom to another resource.

Personally, as a paid up member of both Geni and My Heritage, I am optimistic about the improvements that will come our way and expect that the management team have many exciting new features/improvements planned for us in the near future - and I for one am willing to give them a chance to come up with them.

December 28, 2012 07:51 AM
User photo
John H. Nye
Pro

They say this is an enhancement?  "You can now export a GEDCOM on any profile you've added for free"  But, in reverse this means that PRO users can no longer export profiles they did not create.  For two years I have been working on Benjamin Nye's tree and export the tree weekly for safe keeping, but now I can no longer do this because I dd not creat the profile.  This is not an enhancement for PRO users, but a change for the worse.

December 22, 2012 05:49 PM
User photo
David Prins
Pro

My aim in posting here was to try to get some clarity as to how the updated Privacy Policy is to be interpreted, rather than to talk about right and wrong.

I don't think we have got that clarity as of yet, and I don't know how long it will take before we do.

December 13, 2012 05:25 AM
User photo
Itai Jack Meshulam
Curator

Judi: I completely agree with you: If Geni are talking legal, they illegally changed the attributes of OUR data.
David: If one can deal only with the private profiles in "his" tree, he will never get access to the other tree - and the merges will never happen.

Currently, Geni data is a mess of unintentionally duplicated and multiplicated profiles
(part of it due to the misleading entry screen, which prompts you to start your tree rather than attach to the possibly existing one),
and the new rule makes it impossible to fight these duplications.

December 13, 2012 03:42 AM
User photo
Judith Judi Elaine (McKee) Burns
Pro

David I agree with you  I do no like it that profiles that I DECIDE TO MAKE PUBLIC  in my persoanl tree with no  data in any area  have all of a sudden been turned  private -  they were done in order to promote  research and to find long lost cousins  who may know nothing beyond their parents as  I had  I knew may grandparents -   on my fathers side  but did not even know my maternal grandmothers name untill I started   doing the family history -  many of the   distant cousins I knew by first name  and face only     to me this is an invasion of our rights   we are the ones who  have databased this information into Geni -   I would  difinetly like my profiles reverted back to the way I had them entered in   as public

 

December 13, 2012 03:28 AM
User photo
Enn Olavi Paadimeister
Pro

MyHeritage (USA) Inc.
4778 N 300 W, Suite 230
Provo, Utah 84604

still falls under US law

December 12, 2012 10:12 PM
User photo
David Prins
Pro

Question: Now, with the (unclaimed) profiles of living people being "private" - how can we promote tree merges?

Answer: I think that can now only be done with the participation of the manager of the private profile, or someone in the family group of the manager of the private profile, or someone in the family group of the private profile itself.  This has always been the case with private profiles.  Difference now is that suddenly there are a lot more private profiles than there used to be.

December 12, 2012 03:46 PM
User photo
Itai Jack Meshulam
Curator

Now, with the (unclaimed) profiles of living people being "private" - how can we promote tree merges?

December 12, 2012 06:59 AM
User photo
David Prins
Pro

Thanks Maria.  I look forward to Geni.com providing some more clarity as to how the updated Privacy Policy is to be interpreted.

December 08, 2012 03:07 AM
User photo
Maria Edmonds-Zediker, Volunteer Curator
Curator

I am excited about the improvement in entering dates. This will make profiles on Geni much more accurate. 

I think we can all expect to see much more tweaking of the privacy rules as Geni moves forward with the MyHeritage merger. Don't forget, Other countries have different rules about these things. When we were a totally US-owned company, we clearly stated in our privacy statements that US laws were being applied, and that international users, by using Geni, were agreeing that the information they added to the site, were governed by US law. Now that Geni is owned by a foreign company, we need to adjust to foreign laws. I am sure that Geni's senior management is working very hard to reconcile the differences.

David Prins, as to public figures, I believe there will be a solution through the Master Profile program. Stay tuned. Curators are discussing this very point.

December 07, 2012 08:05 AM
User photo
Lo

Personally, I will be horrified if I can no longer make my deceased relatives private back to 3rd great-grandparent and out to 4th cousin -- especially with the policy in place allowing any Pro to edit or merge any Public Profile on the Big Tree, and given that I am attached to the Big Tree.  Also because in some cases there is definitely info there that was entered in the understanding that these profiles could be kept private so only Family could see them  This would definitely be a violation of what they promised us.  

December 06, 2012 09:59 PM
User photo
David Prins
Pro

The privacy page says  Private profiles are intended for living relatives and minors. Public profiles are intended for deceased relatives and public figures.

Does that mean that Geni users can choose not to follow those intentions, or are those intentions mandatory?  Can a Geni user choose to make a deceased relative private or a living relative public?

It's also unclear how Public Figures would be defined, and what about Public Figures who are minors - such as young royals?

December 06, 2012 09:09 PM
Topic is closed for comments